So far, every novel that has had King Tut in it has been disappointing.

Until now none have provided a satisfactory answer to the mystery of why King Tut’s tomb was the only one found practically intact.

Many scholars, historians, Egyptologists, ‘accredited or orthodox’, now say he was an inconsequential King, ruled by ‘regents, by Aye and by Horemheb, with no real personal power, but....

Maybe his people did not consider Tutankhamen inconsequential. After all many more ‘powerful’ and reknown kings of Egypt undoubtedly had their good friends and loyal followers, and all of their tombs were stripped, many in antiquity (Old Kingdom, Middle Kingdom ).